Heliopædica melanotis
Heliopædica melanotis
Black-eared Humming-bird
- 合集
- 古尔德蜂鸟图谱
- 绘者
- John Gould(约翰·古尔德)
- 年代
- 1850
- 图版号
- Pl. 64, Vol. II
- 原书页码
- p.64
- 授权
- CC0 1.0 Universal (Public domain)
十观
- 纵幅 1.44∶1
第一眼
夫象物必在于形似,形似须全其骨气。
—— 唐·张彦远《历代名画记》
形似只是门槛,骨气才是要害。看一株植物,先看它立不立得住——这就是骨气。这一幅是竖的:眼睛从下往上走,落点在中段那只鸟身上。先别急着看羽毛,让姿态先立起来。第二步凑近一寸:看线与色的交界,色有没有压住线,线有没有断。第三步,把视线放到最深的那一小块:整幅的用色秩序,都是从那里排开的。
名与实
没有学名可依,就看题名:题名里往往藏着产地、赠者或一句形容。此幅既无通行中文名,学名也不可靠,只能以原书题名相称——图谱里总有几幅这样的图,只能靠画面本身说话。
形与色
翼小而振频极高,能悬停、能倒飞;羽色非颜料所致,是羽枝结构折射的光,随角度而变。此幅未作色相归档,只能就形制论。画幅高而窄,形与色的关系因此看得格外清楚:先读轮廓,再读色层,最后才看笔触。
构图与呼吸
画幅高而窄,鸟栖在枝的中段,上下留白多——十九世纪鸟谱的标准版式,留给它飞走的余地。全幅只画一只,不作解剖附图——这类图更近于“观赏”,而非“鉴定”。老图谱爱把主株摆在偏中线的位置,左右留得不一样多:这一点偏心,正是画面活起来的原因。
一刀一色
十九世纪后半叶,石版与彩色石印渐成主流:颜色可以直接印出,不再依赖手工,线条反倒退居其次。图像的“准确”提高了,手性却淡了。先判断它是“印”的还是“画”的,再谈好不好看——这是看老版画最实用的一条规矩。想动笔临它的人记住一句:先铺大块的形与色,干后再收细部;石印的柔和层次来自薄涂与网点,水彩分两三遍淡铺即可逼近。
诗境
穿花蛱蝶深深见,点水蜻蜓款款飞。
—— 唐·杜甫《曲江二首》
中土无蜂鸟,然“穿花”之态,杜甫早已写过:贴着花心走,是采蜜者的共同姿态。把这一句放回画面:画面就是诗句的落点——诗先写气,画后写形,两者在此处接上了。
花语
阿兹特克以蜂鸟为战神与太阳的化身;欧洲维多利亚时代则以蜂鸟为收藏与装饰的极致,百万只羽毛被做成胸饰。中国旧籍无此鸟,故无象征——这空白本身,就是一部博物学交流史。象征多半来自形状与气味:像杯的、像泪的、香的、臭的——先有形状,后有意义。
时与地
热带美洲几乎全年可见,花期即其季节。仅产美洲,自阿拉斯加南部至火地岛,以安第斯山最为繁盛。中土无蜂鸟,汉籍不载,晚清海外游记始见其名。图上所记的 1850 年是刊行之年,不是采到那只鸟的年份;真正的观察记录通常比出版早一两年。看叶的老嫩、花与果是否同在枝上,季节便八九不离十;看题名里藏着的地名,来路也猜得出七分。
书与人
《古尔德蜂鸟图谱》只署了约翰·古尔德一个人的名字。从画稿到成图要过好几双手:转刻的人求准,上色的人求快——快与准之间,就是各幅之间深浅不一的来历。
带走一双眼睛
把这三件事带走:先整体后细节;先线后色;先看画再翻书。任何一张老图版,都可以用这三条读。1850 年的那只鸟早已化作尘土,它留在纸上的样子,却比任何一只活着的同类都长寿。
关于本图版
《古尔德蜂鸟图谱》(Gould's Hummingbirds)由约翰·古尔德绘制,1849—1887 年间印行,本图即其中一幅。画面主体为 Heliopædica melanotis,在分类体系中列于蜂鸟科(Trochilidae)。
该合集全编共 421 幅图版,此图为其中之一,图版编号 Pl. 64, Vol. II,对应原书第 64 页,版式为纵幅。图为公有领域原件的修复扫描,构图与设色未经改动。
原书文字(英文 / 法文)
Guatemala and Mexico
Although Prince Charles Bonaparte and all recent writers consider the present bird and the Trochilus leucotis to be identical, and have made the two names synonymous, I have very great doubt as to the accuracy of this opinion, as Vieillot makes no mention of the splendid blue colouring of the crown, and moreover states that his bird is from Brazil, while the native countries of the one here figured are Guatemala and Mexico.
It is doubtless the Ornismya Arsennii of Lesson, as the figures given by him accord with the two sexes; but his name must give place to the prior one of melanotis assigned to it by Swainson. Lesson evidently had no knowledge of its native country, as, in his description of the male, he states it is from Brazil, and in his endeavour to correct this error, mentions in his account of the female that it is not from Brazil, but from Paraguay, while it is not found in either country. It is one of the prettiest and most highly coloured of the Trochilide, and moreover differs so much in form, and particularly in its markings, from all others that I have proposed for it a new generic title.
I observe that specimens from Mexico are a trifle larger in all their admeasurements than those sent from Guatemala; their colouring, however, is precisely the same.
The sexes differ considerably, the female having none of the brilliant blue on the face or the glittering green of the chest, which are so conspicuous in the opposite sex.
The following is Swainson’s short but expressive description of this bird:—
Golden green; front and chin sapphire-blue; throat emerald-green; ears black, margined above with white; bill red; tail even. Table-land of Mexico, Temiscaltipec, Real del Monte.
To this I may add that the wings are purplish brown; the two centre tail-feathers bronzy green; the lateral feathers in some instances black tipped with bronze, in others their outer webs are bronzy and the inner black; abdomen grey; flanks greenish.
The female has the crown brownish grey; upper surface, wing-coverts, flanks and two centre tail-feathers bronzy green; lateral tail-feathers deep bluish black, washed with bronze at the base and tipped with grey, particularly the outer feather; ear-coverts black, above which is a mark of white; under surface buffy white, spangled here and there with green.
The figures are of the natural size. The plant is the Barkeria elegans.
References
- Trochilus melanotus, Swains. Phil. Mag. 1827, p. 441.
- Trochilus leucotis, Vieill. 2nde Edit. du Nouv. Dict. d’Hist. Nat., tom. xxii. p. 428.—Ib. Ency. Méth. Orn., part 11. p. 559?
- Ornismya Arsennii, Less. Hist. Nat. des Ois.-Mou., pp. xxvij, 60. pl. 9.—Ib. Supp., p. 152. pl. 27.—Ib. Ind. Gen. et Syn. des Ois. du Gen. Trochilus, p. xxxix.—Ib. Traité dOrn., p. 279.—Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-birds, vol. i. p. 137. pl. 20.
- Thaumatias leucotis, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. p. 78, Thaumatias, sp. 8?
- Basilinna leucotis, Reichenb. Aufz. der Colibris, p. 13?