翠蜂鸟属·Chlorostilbon Atala
Chlorostilbon Atala
Chlorostilbon Atala
Atala’s Emerald
- 中文名
- 翠蜂鸟属·Chlorostilbon Atala
- 学名
- Chlorostilbon Atala
- 合集
- 古尔德蜂鸟图谱
- 绘者
- John Gould(约翰·古尔德)
- 年代
- 1861
- 图版号
- Pl. 356, Vol. V
- 原书页码
- p.356
- 授权
- CC0 1.0 Universal (Public domain)
十观
- 纵幅 1.52∶1
第一眼
论画以形似,见与儿童邻。
—— 宋·苏轼《书鄢陵王主簿所画折枝》
只求画得像,是小孩的眼光。苏轼不是不要形似,是说形似之后还有一层:神。这一幅是竖的:眼睛从下往上走,落点在中段那只鸟身上。先别急着看羽毛,让姿态先立起来。第二步凑近一寸:看线与色的交界,色有没有压住线,线有没有断。第三步,把视线放到最深的那一小块:整幅的用色秩序,都是从那里排开的。
名与实
学名 Chlorostilbon atala:前一词是属,管它归在哪一类;后一词是种加词,管它在这一类里凭什么与众不同。名字是通行证,也是懒办法——记住两个词,就抓住了一整个物种。此幅尚无通行中文名,姑以学名相称;在没有本地名字的地方,学名就是它唯一的身份证。
形与色
翼小而振频极高,能悬停、能倒飞;羽色非颜料所致,是羽枝结构折射的光,随角度而变。此幅未作色相归档,只能就形制论。看形制不必求全:记住喙形、翼式与栖姿,这一类的骨架就立住了。
构图与呼吸
画幅高而窄,鸟栖在枝的中段,上下留白多——十九世纪鸟谱的标准版式,留给它飞走的余地。全幅只画一只,不作解剖附图——这类图更近于“观赏”,而非“鉴定”。空白不是没画完,是给眼睛留的落脚处:一张图若四边都塞满,花反而会闷。
一刀一色
十九世纪后半叶,石版与彩色石印渐成主流:颜色可以直接印出,不再依赖手工,线条反倒退居其次。图像的“准确”提高了,手性却淡了。工艺留下的破绽比题跋更诚实:刻工不会撒谎,上色的人赶时间的时候会。想动笔临它的人记住一句:先铺大块的形与色,干后再收细部;石印的柔和层次来自薄涂与网点,水彩分两三遍淡铺即可逼近。
诗境
穿花蛱蝶深深见,点水蜻蜓款款飞。
—— 唐·杜甫《曲江二首》
中土无蜂鸟,然“穿花”之态,杜甫早已写过:贴着花心走,是采蜜者的共同姿态。古人写到这一层,已不只是赏花,是借花说人;画面则只负责把那朵花留住。
花语
阿兹特克以蜂鸟为战神与太阳的化身;欧洲维多利亚时代则以蜂鸟为收藏与装饰的极致,百万只羽毛被做成胸饰。中国旧籍无此鸟,故无象征——这空白本身,就是一部博物学交流史。象征会随世道改口:同一只鸟,在一个世纪里可以说完全相反的话。
时与地
温带种类的蜂鸟则随花北迁,一年往返数千公里。仅产美洲,自阿拉斯加南部至火地岛,以安第斯山最为繁盛。中土无蜂鸟,汉籍不载,晚清海外游记始见其名。图上所记的 1861 年是刊行之年,不是采到那只鸟的年份;真正的观察记录通常比出版早一两年。那一代人对这类鸟的知识,多半来自标本与笼养。看这一类图,不妨把产地和季节都当“据说”来读。
书与人
《古尔德蜂鸟图谱》只署了约翰·古尔德一个人的名字。版画是集体工程:绘图、刻版、上色各有其人,真正决定这幅图好不好看的,常是没留下名字的刻工与上色师。
带走一双眼睛
把这三件事带走:先整体后细节;先线后色;先看画再翻书。任何一张老图版,都可以用这三条读。图谱的用意是“以备查考”,看久了却会忘记查考:1861 年的一个人,为一只鸟花了整整一天。
关于本图版
本图选自约翰·古尔德的《古尔德蜂鸟图谱》(Gould's Hummingbirds),原书 1849—1887 年间出版。图中描绘的是翠蜂鸟,在分类体系中列于蜂鸟科(Trochilidae)。
该合集全编共 421 幅图版,此图为其中之一,图版编号 Pl. 356, Vol. V,对应原书第 356 页,版式为纵幅。图为公有领域原件的修复扫描,构图与设色未经改动。
原书文字(英文 / 法文)
The Island of Trinidad, and Venezuela
The bird figured on the opposite Plate is a native of Trinidad, where it is very common.
I also possess examples from Cayenne and Venezuela. I particularly mention that Trinidad is the country whence the specimens I have represented were brought, because the utmost confusion reigns among the names of the little green Humming-Birds: would that it were in my power to unravel this confusion! I trust some future Trochilidist may be more fortunate than myself, and that he will be able to tell the world what really are the species intended in the plates and descriptions of the older authors; no one would be more happy than I should be to see these knotty points satisfactorily elucidated. I have placed the old Linnæan name of mellisugus to this species with a mark of doubt, having been induced so to do by finding that name written, I believe by M. Bourcier, on one of the specimens in my collection; with a mark of doubt also I have given plates 42 and 65 of Lesson’s ‘Trochilide’ and ‘ Oiseaux-Mouches.’ I have mentioned the difficulty with which the subject is beset in my account of Chlorostilbon prasinus; I need not, then, further allude to it here.
M. Bourcier has described a species of this group under the name of Trochilus Daphne, which so closely resembles this bird as almost to induce a belief that it is identical with it; the T. Daphne, however, differs in having a blue tint of colour over the glittering green of the lower part of the throat and breast; it has also a less forked tail, and, moreover, is from a different locality—the upper parts of the Rio Negro and the eastern confines of Ecuador and Peru.
Mr. Tucker informs me that in Trinidad the Chlorostilbon Atala is found in the large open places, or natural savannahs, between the woods, that it is called the Savannah Sapphire, and that it makes a loud noise with its wings when flying.
The sexes differ very considerably in their colouring, the female having all those parts of the under surface buffy grey which are green in the male.
The male has the head, all the upper surface, and wing-coverts shining golden green, most brilliant on the head; throat and all the under surface glittering green; wings purplish brown; upper tail-coverts green; tail steely or bluish black; the bill appears to have been black.
The female has the upper surface of the same hue as her mate, but not so brilliant; a greyish mark behind the eye; all the under surface buffy grey; two centre tail-feathers green; the three next on each side green at the base and bluish black towards their extremities, which are slightly tipped with grey; the outer feather on each side bluish black, slightly washed with green at the base, and tipped with grey.
The Plate represents two males and a female, of the size of life. The plant is the Stanhopea ecornuta.
References
- Ornismya atala, Less. Hist. Nat. des Troch., p. 115, pl. 42??
- Ornismya prasina, Less. Hist. Nat. des Ois.-Mou., p. 188, pl. 65?
- Hylocharis atala, Gray and Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 115, Hylocharis, sp. 47?
- Saucerottia Atala, Reichenb. Auf. der Col., p. 7?
- Saucerottia atala, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av., p. 77, Saucerottia, sp. 4?
- Trochilus mellisugus, Linn.?