翠蜂鸟属·Chlorostilbon Poortmanni
Chlorostilbon Poortmanni
Chlorostilbon Poortmanni
Poortman’s Emerald
- 中文名
- 翠蜂鸟属·Chlorostilbon Poortmanni
- 学名
- Chlorostilbon Poortmanni
- 合集
- 古尔德蜂鸟图谱
- 绘者
- John Gould(约翰·古尔德)
- 年代
- 1861
- 图版号
- Pl. 358, Vol. V
- 原书页码
- p.358
- 授权
- CC0 1.0 Universal (Public domain)
十观
- 略纵 1.21∶1
第一眼
竖划三寸,当千仞之高;横墨数尺,体百里之迥。
—— 南朝宋·宗炳《画山水序》
三寸的竖线可当千仞高山,几尺横墨能容百里之远。尺幅从来不是障碍,取舍才是本事。这一幅略高于宽,落点在中央偏上那只鸟的头部。第二步凑近一寸:看线与色的交界,色有没有压住线,线有没有断。第三步,把视线放到最深的那一小块:整幅的用色秩序,都是从那里排开的。
名与实
学名 Chlorostilbon poortmanni:前一词是属,管它归在哪一类;后一词是种加词,管它在这一类里凭什么与众不同。一百多年前的命名者,把一种植物的来历压进了两个词。此幅尚无通行中文名,姑以学名相称;在没有本地名字的地方,学名就是它唯一的身份证。
形与色
蜂鸟为美洲最小之鸟,喙细长如针,舌分叉成管,可伸入花心吸蜜;翼小而振频极高,能悬停、能倒飞。此幅未作色相归档,只能就形制论。没有解剖图,就靠主株一处一处看过去:叶怎么排,花怎么着生,果在哪里。
构图与呼吸
画幅略高于宽,鸟身居中偏上,视线落在头部与喙。全幅只画一只,不作解剖附图——这类图更近于“观赏”,而非“鉴定”。老图谱爱把主株摆在偏中线的位置,左右留得不一样多:这一点偏心,正是画面活起来的原因。
一刀一色
十九世纪后半叶,石版与彩色石印渐成主流:颜色可以直接印出,不再依赖手工,线条反倒退居其次。图像的“准确”提高了,手性却淡了。先判断它是“印”的还是“画”的,再谈好不好看——这是看老版画最实用的一条规矩。想动笔临它的人记住一句:先铺大块的形与色,干后再收细部;石印的柔和层次来自薄涂与网点,水彩分两三遍淡铺即可逼近。
诗境
夫列子御风而行,泠然善也,旬有五日而后反。
—— 《庄子·逍遥游》
蜂鸟悬停于空,不落不飞,最近于“御风”。庄子说的是一种自由的姿态,蜂鸟把它做成了生理事实。把这一句放回画面:画面就是诗句的落点——诗先写气,画后写形,两者在此处接上了。
花语
阿兹特克以蜂鸟为战神与太阳的化身;欧洲维多利亚时代则以蜂鸟为收藏与装饰的极致,百万只羽毛被做成胸饰。中国旧籍无此鸟,故无象征——这空白本身,就是一部博物学交流史。花语是后人添上去的,花本身并不知道;但这层“不知道”,正是它最动人的地方。
时与地
温带种类的蜂鸟则随花北迁,一年往返数千公里。仅产美洲,自阿拉斯加南部至火地岛,以安第斯山最为繁盛。中土无蜂鸟,汉籍不载,晚清海外游记始见其名。图上所记的 1861 年是刊行之年,不是采到那只鸟的年份;真正的观察记录通常比出版早一两年。同一株植物,春秋两季像两种东西;同一座山,一百年前与今天叫两个名字。图把这两样都冻结在了纸上。
书与人
《古尔德蜂鸟图谱》只署了约翰·古尔德一个人的名字。从画稿到成图要过好几双手:转刻的人求准,上色的人求快——快与准之间,就是各幅之间深浅不一的来历。
带走一双眼睛
把这三件事带走:先整体后细节;先线后色;先看画再翻书。任何一张老图版,都可以用这三条读。图谱的用意是“以备查考”,看久了却会忘记查考:1861 年的一个人,为一只鸟花了整整一天。
关于本图版
此图原刊于《古尔德蜂鸟图谱》(Gould's Hummingbirds),绘者为约翰·古尔德,成书于 1849—1887 年间。画面主体是翠蜂鸟,归入蜂鸟科(Trochilidae)。
全编共收录 421 幅图版,本图是其中一幅,原书将其列为 Pl. 358, Vol. V,见第 358 页,版式为纵幅。图为公有领域原件的修复扫描,构图与设色未经改动。
原书文字(英文 / 法文)
New Granada
If the term insignificant should ever be applied to this bird, it certainly cannot be employed when speaking of the lovely plant figured on the accompanying Plate.
Now it may be asked, if the bird and the plant are ever in such close juxtaposition as I have represented them; to which I reply, that in all probability they are, though I have no actual evidence that such is the case; I know that the Humming-Birds examine individually most of the plants in the regions they frequent, whether in the woods or savannahs, and the chances are, therefore, that the Victoria regia is not unvisited by this bird during its peregrinations.
No one member of this little group of Humming-Birds is so diminutive as the present species, whose short tail, composed of ten narrow feathers, will at all times serve to distinguish it from its allies, the nearest of which is the Chlorostilbon Aliciæ. Both species inhabit the same part of America,—that is, Columbia and the country immediately to the eastward. We often receive examples from Bogota; indeed it may be said that all, or nearly all, the specimens sent to this country and to France are from thence. The same difference occurs in the colouring of the sexes of both species; the females having the under surface grey, instead of glittering green. The young males are all intermediate in their style of colouring, but have larger tails than the female.
Head golden orange; all the upper surface, wing- and tail-coverts reddish bronzy green; wings purplish brown; tail dark bronzy green, both on the upper and under surface; all the under surface, including the under tail-coverts, dull bronzy green; bill black; feet dark brown.
The female has the upper surface similarly coloured to that of the male, but far less brilliant; the under surface grey; the wings purplish brown; the centre tail-feathers green; the remainder green at the base, passing into black near the extremity, and tipped with greyish; under tail-coverts greyish brown.
The young male is similar to the female, but has the under surface spangled with golden green.
The Plate represents a male and a female of the natural size.
References
- Ornismya Poortman, Bourc. in Rev. Zool. 1843, p. 2.
- Hylocharis Portmanni, Gray and Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 115, Hylocharis, sp. 48.—Sclat. in Proc. of Zool. Soc., part xxii. p. 141.
- Hylocharis portman, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av., p. 74, Hylocharis, sp. 11.
- Chlorestes Poortmanni, Reichenb. Auf. der Col., p. 7.
- Chlorostilbon poortmani, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 255.