宝石蜂鸟属
Lampornis aurulentus
Lampornis aurulentus
St. Domingo Mango
- 中文名
- 宝石蜂鸟属
- 学名
- Lampornis aurulentus
- 合集
- 古尔德蜂鸟图谱
- 绘者
- John Gould(约翰·古尔德)
- 年代
- 1850
- 图版号
- Pl. 79, Vol. II
- 原书页码
- p.79
- 授权
- CC0 1.0 Universal (Public domain)
关于本图版
本图选自约翰·古尔德的《古尔德蜂鸟图谱》(Gould's Hummingbirds),原书 1849—1887 年间出版。图中描绘的是宝石蜂鸟,学名 Lampornis aurulentus,在分类体系中列于蜂鸟科(Trochilidae)。
该合集全编共 421 幅图版,此图为其中之一,图版编号 Pl. 79, Vol. II,对应原书第 79 页,版式为纵幅。图为公有领域原件的修复扫描,构图与设色未经改动。
原书文字(英文 / 法文)
St. Domingo
I have adopted the term aurulentus for this fine species because we know positively that it has been applied to the male bird figured on the accompanying Plate, while there is a degree of uncertainty whether margaritaceus has reference to this or some other species.
In adopting this name I am following in the steps of Vieillot, Bonaparte, and many modern authors. The old name of dominicus would perhaps be the most correct and appropriate one, but that term is considered by more recent writers to be referable to the L. gramineus; with the synonymy of the present species, in fact, as with that of L. gramineus, the utmost confusion prevails; it will be better, therefore, to retain the name of aurulentus. The native country of this species is St. Domingo: as to Porto Rico, which it is also said to inhabit, I leave it to future Trochilidists to say if it be found there or not; in all probability it may inhabit both those contiguous islands, but I have no positive evidence that such is the case.
Unlike the females of most of the other species of Lampornis, which bear a general resemblance to each other, the female of this species is very dissimilar, having the whole of her under surface grey, in lieu of the striped and variegated style of markings which prevail in the females of L. Mango, L. gramineus, L. Prevosti, &c.; this grey colouring of the under surface is, however, the only point of difference, the tail being marked very similarly.
The male has the head, all the upper surface, wing- and tail-coverts dark yellowish green; throat dull golden green; all the under surface dull black; a tuft of white on each flank; wings purplish brown; two central tail-feathers dark bronzy purple; lateral feathers violaceous purple, bordered with dark purple.
The female has all the upper surface and two central tail-feathers bronzy green; all the under surface grey; lateral tail-feathers purplish chestnut, with a broad band of dull black near the tip, which is white.
The Plate represents both sexes of the size of life. The plant is the Passiflora penduliflora.
References
- Trochilus margaritaceus, Gmel. Edit. Linn. Syst. Nat., tom. i. p. 490?—Lath. Ind. Orn., vol. i. p. 308.
- Le Hausse-col doré, Vieill. Ois. Dor., tom. i. pp. 29, 31. pls. 12, 13.
- Trochilus aurulentus, Vieill. Nouv. Dict. d’ Hist. Nat., tom. vii. p: 350.—Dumont, Dict. Sci. Nat., tom. x. p. 49.—Drapiez, Dict. Class. d’Hist. Nat., tom. iv. p. 318.—Vieill. Ency. Méth. Orn., part ii. p. 555.—Less. Hist. Nat. des Col., pp. 68, 71, 73, 74. pls. 16, 17, 18 19.—Ib. Ind Gent et Syn. des Ois. du Gen. Trochilus, p. xj.—lb. Traité d’Orn., p. 289.—Shaw, Gen. Zool., vol. viii. p. 806.—Ib. Steph. Cont., vol. xiv. p. 240.
- Polytmus margaritaceus, Gray and Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 108, Polytmus, sp. 13.
- Polytmus aurulentus, Vieill. Hist. Nat. des Ois. de l’Am. Sept., tom. ii. p. 72.
- Lampornis margaritaceus, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av., p. 72, Lampornis, sp. 5.
- Eulampis aurulentus, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 250.
- Margarochrysis aurulenta, Reichenb. Aufz. der Colibris, p. 11.
- Grey-necked Humming-bird, Lath. Gen. Syn., vol. ii. p. 761.—Ib. Gen. Hist., vol. iv. p. 304.
- Aurulent Humming-bird, Shaw, Gen. Zool., vol. viii. p. 306.—Lath. Gen. Hist., vol. iv. p. 307.
- Trochilus dominicus, Linn. Syst. Nat., tom. i. p. 191.—Gmel. Edit. Linn. Syst. Nat., tom. i. p. 489.—Lath. Ind. Orn., vol. i. p. 309, female?
- Polytmus dominicus, Briss. Orn., tom. i. p. 672. pl. xxxv. fig. 4, female?
- Verte perlé, Buff. Hist. Nat. des Ois., tom. vi. p. 62.—Vieill. Ois. Dor., tom. i. p. 128.
- Saint Domingo Humming-bird, Lath. Gen. Syn., vol. ti. p. 762.—Ib. Gen. Hist., vol. iv. p. 306.
十二观
一幅图版,分十二个角度来读:名物、形色、刀笔、构图、时序、故土、谱系、花语、诗境、典故、观法、余韵。前七观是它的来历,后五观是它的余味。
-
名物考
原书题作「Lampornis aurulentus」,编为图版 79, Vol. II(原书第 79 页)。学名“Lampornis aurulentus”。双名制里,属名指其类,种加词多取产地、形态或受赠者之名——一百多年前的命名者,把一种生物的来历压进了两个词。中文名“宝石蜂鸟属”是后人据学名回译的通行叫法,与古书里的旧名未必对得上;名与物之间,总隔着一层翻译。
-
形与色
蜂鸟为美洲最小之鸟,喙细长如针,舌分叉成管,可伸入花心吸蜜;翼小而振频极高,能悬停、能倒飞;羽色非颜料所致,是羽枝结构折射的光,随角度而变。此幅未作色相归档;看它的形制,仍能读出那个季节的用色习惯。看形制不必求全:记住叶序、花被数与着生方式,这一类的骨架就立住了。
-
刀笔与色层
十九世纪后半叶,石版与彩色石印渐成主流:颜色可以直接印出,不再依赖手工,线条反倒退居其次。图像的“准确”提高了,手性却淡了。此幅的线条与色块,可以拿放大镜看:线若连续不断,是刻的;色若溢出轮廓半毫米,是手涂的。工艺留下的破绽,比题跋更诚实。
-
构图与留白
画幅高而窄,主株一路向上,上下留白多,是图谱中最常见的立轴式构图。(画幅高宽比约 1.72∶1)全幅只画一株,不作解剖附图——这类图更近于“观赏”,而非“鉴定”。
-
时序
热带美洲几乎全年可见,花期即其季节;温带种类的蜂鸟则随花北迁,一年往返数千公里。图上所记的 1850 年是刊行之年,不是花期;真正的花期藏在原书的采集记录里,比出版早一两年。
-
故土
仅产美洲,自阿拉斯加南部至火地岛,以安第斯山最为繁盛。中土无蜂鸟,汉籍不载,晚清海外游记始见其名。同一部图谱里,同类往往排在一起;把几幅并看,差别比单看一幅清楚得多。
-
谱系
《古尔德蜂鸟图谱》(Gould's Hummingbirds)由约翰·古尔德绘,成于1849-1887。此幅为其中图版 79, Vol. II,见原书第 79 页。图版今属公有领域,可自由取用;但纸上那层手工上色,仍是两百年前某一个人的手。
-
花语与象征
阿兹特克以蜂鸟为战神与太阳的化身;欧洲维多利亚时代则以蜂鸟为收藏与装饰的极致,百万只羽毛被做成胸饰。中国旧籍无此鸟,故无象征——这空白本身,就是一部博物学交流史。象征会随世道改口:同一种花,在一个世纪里可以说完全相反的话。
-
诗境
夫列子御风而行,泠然善也,旬有五日而后反。
—— 《庄子·逍遥游》
蜂鸟悬停于空,不落不飞,最近于“御风”。庄子说的是一种自由的姿态,蜂鸟把它做成了生理事实。古人写到这一层,已不只是赏花,是借花说人;画面则只负责把那朵花留住。
-
典与谱
古尔德《蜂鸟图谱》(1849—1887)以石版手工上色,金箔衬底,使羽色在纸上仍有金属光;这套图册本身就是十九世纪印刷与收藏狂热合流的产物。中国的花谱重品第与品格,欧洲的植物志重形态与命名;此图站在后一条线上,却也经得起前一种眼光——毕竟看花的人,两样都要。图谱求准,花谱求品;把两种读法叠在一起,才不至于只看懂一半。
-
观法
看喉部与背部的金属光:那是结构色,画家须用金箔或叠色才追得上;再看舌与喙的比例,长喙者多取深管花,短喙者取浅花——鸟与花是配套演化的。古法看画讲“远观其势,近取其质”,图版亦然:退后两步看姿态,凑近看线与色的交界。
-
余韵
图谱的用意是“以备查考”,看久了却会忘记查考:1850 年的一个人,为一只鸟花了整整一天。